A Hole which is not a Hole (by Allan Poe bona Redoña)

'...their existence is nearly impossible to confirm, black holes..." -  Nat.Geo. page 734, June 1982

    From this line, astrophysicists are obviously dealing with not certained or perhaps do-not-existing black holes.
Why they don't pay their attention to real, factual black holes? The possible big reason is that the mystical uncertained black holes could fit their notion, while factual ones will not.
   Notoriously, they even declared that a black hole is not a hole but an object, suggesting that they are pondering on to a black object and not to a dark hole.
   " black hole...a hypothetical celestial object..."    Merriam-Webster's Collegiate 10th Dictionary, p.119

   Therefore, there is a subliminal deception in calling the 'black object'  a  "black hole".  But, of course, in reality, black hole is called by the term because it is a hole; in fact, a black galactic hole is a dark womb being left by an ejected guasar (daughter galaxy). Black hole is not just a hypothetical or unconfirmable, but a factual dark hole: if and only if we are searching a factual black hole.
There are many types of black hole, search  " Black Hole's  Classes by Allan Poe B. Redona "   in   Google.com  to see some factual pictures of real black holes.
    Although it is not easy to accept that sometime in our life we were deceived (deliberately or not), but the moment you read this exposé, it's time to correct the mistakes of the 2nd Scientific revolution, even our mistakes.
     Tell me honestly and with clear conscience, is a Black hole a hole or   'not a hole'  ?
   The uncertained answer of astronomers:  " It is not really a hole. " (The  Universe, vol. 7, p.85, Childcrafft. copyright 1996. World Book inc. USA)
   Will you remain silent about that deception?

A Hole which is not a  Hole ?
(by Allan Poe B. Redoña)?

To see factual photographs of   real black holes,        click HERE...