Monday, April 25, 2011

Leading to a scientific revolution

3rd Scientific Revolution galleryh.gifi.gif3rd scientific Revolution galleryd.gif
Galactic Birthc.gifi.gife.gifn.gift.gifi.gifGalactic Birthi.gifc.gif
r.gifGalactic Birthv.gifCreations Remembrancel.gifu.gifCreations Remembrancei.gifo.gifn.gif
It is a previlege for Philippines that a Pilipino has discovered that Antennae Galaxies, Milky Way & Magellanic Clouds, Merging Galaxies, and the like, are galactic ejections (the way how give birth the galaxies) and not a phenomenon of  galactic collisions (o mga banggaan ng mga ariwanas).


In 2006, Allan Poe Bona Redona has started to uncover the mystery of the unified field entity and found out that the electrostatic, magnetic, & gravitational entities are 'organs' of the same body (photon), which had eluded Einstein. The unfolding of then some mysteries in physics,became easy and ramifying, most importantly the rediscovery about the master-existence-rings and the absolute Causer of all things.
Despite of the odds: health decline, financial crisis, and criticism, Allan Poe B. Redoña has enabled to introduce the 3rd Scientific Revolution in the remote West . Whatever their response the history for the 3rd Scientific Revolution is now an unavoidable phenomenon and it is best to be a part of it. But of course Allan, an emaciated man from the islands in the far East, cannot do all things for this 'walk' and he needs aids from those who are willing to be a part of this endeavor and those who have good heart to help other, in this case, Allan Poe B.R.
Moral support is valuable aid to pursue our 'walk' in the 3rd revolution on science. The 1st Scientific Revolution happened when Copernicus & Galileo made known to the world that the Earth or planets revolve around the Sun but the then world, including universities and religions, got mad on them. It took decades or centuries before the mad university & religious people accepted the revolutionary

When X-ray was discovered and the Theory of Relativity was introduced, the scientific community was then journeying in the 2nd Scientific Revolution.By the last part of the year CE 2007, Allan has initiated challenge by "If...,then..." open letters to some places. The letter he formerly addressed to Sheryl Goddard of the Office of Procurement, Program Operation Division of NASA was annexed to his newer letter "Give Him Glory! Our Origin; It's Not the Gravity: A Brief History of My Inclination toward Physics", thence making introduced into the inhabited world the 3rd Scientific Revolution, and the end of not increasing knowledge The key for the unified field entity's mathematical equation or formula was at last discovered on February 8, 2008.
The task (propagate the scientific revolutionary discoveries) is too difficult to be done alone by Allan Poe but he never lost his courage to still walk a walk that Galileo, Newton, Einstein, and others had walked. Last February 27, 2008, Allan Poe went to Batasang Pambansa in Quezon City and on an elevated area beside the road there between outside the fronts of the gates of the Philippine House of Representatives and of the Police Station he stood up for hours till twilight hanging a placard with: "Avoid Armed Revolution. You Know What Revolution Do We Need?"
Not a single police man dared to directly, personally stop him, or say, "You're asking a wrong ask." But alas, media men here, as what had done by learned men during the time of Galileo, are not ready for a change in science and rather busied themselves, and spend their time, in sensationalized political matters, particularly of the never ending story of the falling/rising witnesses.
Let us follow the examples left by Galileo, Newton, and Einstein, who, in defense for the Creator and nature, stood firmly despite of many antagonizing then scientists and religious personalities.
Tell these things to your friends, colleagues, co-workers, and teachers. Ask media men in print, TV, and radio and science men in schools, universities or fields about the THIRD SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION.
Having chance, on August 12, 2009 at past 6pm in Bldg.5 of TESDA Complex, Allan Poe Bona Redoña has told his idea of inventing (1) a computer fastener, composed of alligator cluthes, which can resist strong earthquakes as well as can be easily opened during a fire, and (2) a room-temperature superconductor detector, which uses no helium or nitrogen cooling agent to Mrs. Luz DG. Galang, senior TESD specialist, and Mr. Ronald Talion, PSME/OEMAP.
Prior that time, in the siminar at TESDA's LSI, engineer Daniel D. Dinguel gave a kidding that Allan Poe B. Redoña will succeed him after Allan asked who would continue the inventing of car's engine runned by water.
Personally, Allan told a proposal to Mr. Talion that Allan Poe B. Redoña's discovered & conceptualized Dream-Inducing Machine (instruments) might be constructed by the colleague inventors if Mr.Talion was willing to suggest it to the Filipino Inventors Society. Alas, Mr.Talion was not willing.
Let us give glory to the Causer-of-Existence, and tell to the world His marvelous works.Be Inquisitive and know, for examples Einstein, Newton, and the most wanted profile in the world.
Allan Poe Bona Redoña cellphone number 63908 3237 317
& email address thirdscience@yahoo.com




  1. «Click here to know what is Gravity»
  2. ←Galaxy, giving birth to daughters
  3. ◄MAGNETISM, what it is ?►
  4. Factual Atoms
  5. Click Here
◄go to DISCOVERED At Last►





Unified Field Formula discovered at last

bT*xJmx*PTEyMzU5Mjk4MjY5NTMmcHQ9MTIzNTkyOTg*NTU*NiZwPTE5NTAxJmQ9Jmc9MSZvPTc3ZmQzOGIyYjhjODQ5MjJhMjI3ZTA2NjZkODVmZmU4Jm9mPTA=.gif
" I guess we are in for a Big Scientific revolution"This was the December 19, 2009

 (12:20am) comment of Mr. Okunola Kazeem O, a physicist by training, to Allan Poe Redoña in  Facebook


◄Previous...Next►



Correspondence  Among  Physics Enthusiasts (e.g. Students, Physicists, Scientists, Teachers, Researchers, or Curious Ones)

 "  I guess  we  are  in  for  a Big  Scientific  revolution  "   -    Okunola  Kazeem O    on Facebook December 19, 2009 at 12:20am

  (from FACEBOOK.com)                   Conversation started May 14, 2011                                                                                       




  • 1:00am
  • 1:01am
    Allan Poe Bona Redoña

    Hello, I am commenting on Quantum Physics here on Facebbok.
    • 1:01am
      Kazeem Okunola O

      great
      any Quantum gist
      • 1:03am
        Allan Poe Bona Redoña

        That there was past truth and is present truth, which are different from FACT.
        • 1:03am
          Kazeem Okunola O

          k
          am a physicist by training
          • 1:04am
            Allan Poe Bona Redoña

            That " TRUTH " is based on laws, whereas FACT is based on What Happens.
            • 1:05am
              Kazeem Okunola O

              expantiate
              • 1:06am
                Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                I have no degree or whatsoever. But it's okay, as long as we can equate things to get laws.
                • 1:06am
                • 1:10am
                  Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                  I have so many things discovered (including to equation how man can literally duplicate black hole, etc.) but I'm not wealthy enough to publish in books those discoveries. I have asked some Filipinoes to construct Dream-Inducing Machine, for I discovered how to invent it, but they are not willing.
                  • 1:10am
                    Kazeem Okunola O

                    k
                    thats great
                    giv me a minute
                    you must get a lot of inspiration
                    • 1:12am
                      Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                      In fact, any body can induce dream to a sleeping person so that, we can know later that what are discussed in all Psychology books are wrong.
                      However, I'm afraid to publicly open (discuss) the " How Brain generates mind " and how those dreams happens in the body because of the possibility the Extreme Atheism might use them to prove their wrong notion about "All things are no absolute Causer ".
                      In Quasmospectrum Electronomics some of the 3rd Scientific Revolutionary things are discussed.
                      Kindly, search " Quasmospectrum atom , galaxy, gravity " in www.Google.com                   

                      __________________________________________________________________________

                                                                       Conversation started May 14, 2011 at 1:14am                
                      • Billy Hollingshead
                        Hi
                        Pleased to meet you. Thanks for an interesting discussion.
                        Regards, Billy
                        • 1:25am
                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                          Thank you. I like too, but alas, I'm not wealthy enough to even move from one province to another here in our country. I am poor, and that's made me concentrated in Science searching & researching. Kindly, search " QuasmosPecTrum atom, gravity " in www.Google.com
                          • 1:32am
                            Billy Hollingshead

                            You have a good intelligent mind and maybe that will take you out of your situation. Good luck to you.
                            I will look at your link. Thanks!                                                      
                                                                                                                                               
                            _______________________________________________________

                            Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                            With this model based on the factual atoms we can easily understand & explain the things about atoms; for instance, the more deep the dentured of electron in the atom, the harder it to be pulled out (or the higher its ionization energy).It also explains that when electron is Redoña-pulled out, the magnetic portion of the atom is exposed (so that the atom become magnetic). Traditional "planetary model" could not explicitly explain the magnetic phenomenon because of wrong atomic model.


                            Here is the picture of factual silicon atoms photographed by scanning tunneling microscope (Source: Science Photo Library). We can see pengraletic electrons junctioned the atoms. It disproves the cliam of Werner Heisenberg that we cannot see electrons. Of course, during Heisenberg's time electrons were impossible to be photographed, but not in our time.

                            (May 15, 2011)



                        Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                        If atoms are not real, then what is this factual picture of the gold atoms?
                        Atoms are not only theory, but factual. To learn more about atoms, search " pengralet " in Google.com


                        (July 14, 2011)





                        Video taken November 2008 (Allan Poe Bona Redoña) showing the aggregating jumping electrons tinier than needle's point  - at Bicutan Taguig City.
                                                                                                  Kazeem Okunola O  likes this.

                        _________________________________________________________________________________









                        When a mother galaxy gives birth to its daughter (galaxy), it will usually eject the GUASAR (future daughter galaxy) from its abdomen, leaving a dark womb (black hole) in the said galactic abdomen (body). As the guasar is moving away, it will tear down into fragments (stars) and becoming a galaxy on its own action. - Allan Poe Bona Redoña (Dec./ 22, 2012)
                        Krystal M Brown likes this.


                        • Like ·  ·  · December 24, 2012 at 9:08pm
                          • Sid Ghaderi and Jar Avuy like this.
                          • Sid Ghaderi What is the assumption here Allan ? That Atoms are solid and not hollow ?
                            Can you with certainty conclude that a picture of an atom taken by typical lenses is able to capture or tolerate the very short wavelengths of light that would be require ?
                            Are the lumps in the photos truly the fact I suspect you think they are ?
                            Are you implying that in the photograph of an atom what we are seeing is an atom of cloud of electron ?
                          • Allan Poe Bona Redoña Now we are requiring CERTAINTY. This may mean we are leaving the " Uncertainty " of the mystical physics of most popular science. The drops of ions on the scanner detector got their shoot from the particles (cloud) of the atoms as the electrostatic force moved the electric current from the needle to the scanner detector. The image produced is the surface of those atoms. The term solid, we know, is applicable to our big senses (a stick cellular-size organism might not be solid for us, because of its softness, but for organism much smaller than the cell, that stick organism is hard as a solid rod).
                          • Allan Poe Bona Redoña If we cannot believe on the factual photograph of atoms, then how much more we will have to believe on the unseen mystical planetary-like atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution?
                          • Sid Ghaderi It is an interesting theory . 
                            However , it may very well be a matter of interpretation . The eyes do not always reveal what is out there . do they ? And at time misleading !
                            Have you received any opinions on this theory ? Just curious .
                          • Allan Poe Bona Redoña DNA, viruses, and tiny organisms can be photographed by means of Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and even heavier atoms by means of highly powerful SEM, whereas average atoms (either of metal or other solid) can be seen now by Scanning Tunelling Microscope (STM), and yet there's no question if the DNA, viruses or tiny organisms are shown by means of subatomic particles (i.e. electrons, as image copier and image carrier): the photograph shown is enough to explain itself. But, if atoms are shown by means of subatomic particles (i.e. electrons as image copier, and ions as image carrier) why their photograph is NOT ENOUGH to explain itself? In the first place, the heavier atoms being photographed by SEM (scanning electron microscope) don't show planetary-like atoms but spherical atoms. And if the upper portions of the atoms and electrons are detected by those instruments, it means that those portions are NOT EMPTY but made up (or composed of) tinier particles (i.e. we call beta photons). -- Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                          • Sid Ghaderi We've been able to resolve single atoms on a surface of atoms, that is probably what some have referred to as pictures of single atoms for quite a while. There has to be a shadow if not EMPTY..... Is the shadow the cloud then ?
                            There were some new re                            search mid year this year at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia which effectively provided images of the shadow of a single free atom, that’s the difference here. Whether this counts as taking a picture I'm not sure.

                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                          Misleading Excuse - " There are some things of which the human race must remain in ignorance forever," philosophically taught Auguste Comte in 1835, "for instance, the constitution of the heavenly bodies." 
                          this Comtist way of thinking begot a modern version, i.e., the principle of underterminacy. according to the Uncertainty Principle, it is not possible to determine accurately at the same time the position & velocity of a particle -at least incapable of being known for Werner Karl Heisenberg, but not for nature, mathematics and tunneling scanning microscope. That modern Comtistic principle (i.e. the impossibility of knowing), introduced in 1927 by Heisenberg, is applicable if one is dealing with the uncertained (undefined) or mystical particle- notoriously the planet-like particle-but-wave orbiting, rotating bit electron.
                          Of course it is seemed impossible to locate the electron if the electron we are searching on is dented on the nucleon(s). What velocity does it have if it is dented? Contrary to the mystical electron, factual electrons are easily located as what we can see on the scientific photograph here. (Allan Poe Bona Redoña)




                          (December 27, 2011)



                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña


                          Confusion is a result of an undefined thing if tried to explain by unnatural mystical means. Mysticism is the best way of those who try to "end" a query or subject without clarity or proper definition. A religion best for such mysticism is the mystical physics of the 2nd Scientific Revolution -giving CONFUSION, rather than an answer. Instead of saying zero (0) is the baseline of counting forward or backward, they would say, it is the mystical number. We know that zero is the "limit" to begin the forward counting or the "end" of backward (negative) numbers. If the "limitation" is exceeded, then transformation (change) may happen. Instead of simply saying "it is a stable helium", the mystics would say, "it is a hydrogen in four masses;" or "we are solid", mystics would say, "we are plasma". If that is the way we explain, why we need to distinguish things? Distinguishing things requires baseline and standard. Otherwise, all things have no differentiation because all things are absolutely made up of absolute contents. What is the sense if we say the absolute contents (you) react on absolute contents (stimulus) and absolute contents (feel) absolute contents (it) and absolute contents (think) that absolute contents (it) are absolute contents (real)? Mystical? Awesome? Nonsense! The nature itself teaches us that we are rational. Speak rationally and not irrationally. All things have given life, but not all things are living organisms, and not all living organisms are rational. Limitations give us opportunities to distinguish or differentiate one thing from the other. Such limitations can give an opportunity to see the world in a colorful 3-dimensional reality; otherwise, what we can see are all tiny dots of power. - Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 29, 2012)
                          Like ·  ·  · Saturday at 11:05am

                        _________________________________________________________________________________


                        _______________________________________________________



                        The UNIFIED FIELD formula - by Allan Poe Bona Redoña .
                        search " Unified field formula by Allan Poe Bona Redona " inwww.Google.com for further info.
                        The UNIFIED FIELD formula - by @[100000242523720:2048:Allan Poe Bona Redoña] . search " Unified field formula by Allan Poe Bona Redona " in www.Google.com for further info.

                        Like ·  ·  · December 22, 2012 at 5:12pm
                        • Jar Avuy likes this.
                        • Sid Ghaderi Is your assumption that Light has a constant /fixed speed ? If so, the proposed equation may need some further work ! Nice try though !
                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña The light we are witnessing in everyday life can be decelerated; but it has a baseline (or usual) velocity, which is known the SPEED OF LIGHT. What the formula suggests is that the magnetenderic, electenderic and gravitenderic properties of a unified field entity (photon) can be internally active (so that it is magnetically and electrically undetectable,and usually called gamma photon) or externally active (so that it can be detected by magnetic and/or electric means,and we call it beta-photon, conventionally, of electron ray ). The arrangement of those tenderic properties will result to the name gamma photon into of electron ray. The difference between gamma ray and electron ray is the arrangement of their tenderic properties. The former (i.e. gamma) has internally active magnetenderic and electenderic proeprties, whereas the latter (i.e. electron) has externally active tenderic properties. Different arrangements of these tenderic properties are the reason of various properties of subatomic particle (named varied-ly; so that there are various subatomic particles, from lightest to heavier ones). -Allan Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                        • Sid Ghaderi I provided a response to a similar question/theory sometimes ago.
                          Just to be clear , when you refer to Electron ray do you mean X-ray and/ or Cathode Rays ?
                          If so, then the statement " The difference between gamma ray and electron ray is the arrangement of their tenderic properties." is not accurate .
                          The only difference between ALL x-rays and gamma rays are the origin of the ray itself. X-rays originate from the electron shell, gamma rays originate from the nucleus. This is the true definition of what the difference is between X-rays and gamma rays. 

                          For example, a 140 MeV X-ray is identical to a 140 MeV gamma ray. Any wave/photon with the same energy is also going to have the same wavelength and frequency. (Use the equation E=h*c/lambda, where h is planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and lambda is the wavelength.)
                          What am I missing here ?
                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña Would you mind if I ask, what is that shell (i.e. electron shell) composed of ? Is that shell composed of "nothingness" or of electron's particles ? I'm referring to factual electron and not to a theoretical electron. Factual electrons of the atoms can be photographed by STM.
                        • Sid Ghaderi Are you referring to Photons /light ?
                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña a beam of light may be composed of rays, each of which is composed of quanta. Quantum is a photon or a group of photons.



                        _____________________________________________________________________________________________


                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution.
                        - Sincerely,
                        Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)
                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution. - Sincerely, Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)
                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution. - Sincerely, Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)
                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution. - Sincerely, Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)
                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution. - Sincerely, Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)
                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution. - Sincerely, Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)
                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution. - Sincerely, Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)
                        Factual atoms and electrons are available now by STM, and yet many scientists and almost all textbooks dedicated for atoms and/or electrons still believe that atoms are either "not real" (basing on Heisenberg's notion) or remain a theory (basing on the Rutherford-Bohr's planetary-like system atom). One possible reason why factual atoms are neglected is that they do not confirm (or, are not fit to) the most popular atomic theory. Instead of Factual Atom textbooks until now have Atomic Theory for the students. I am hoping that the revolutionary explanation about atoms and electrons basing on factual atoms someday will replace the most persistent mystical atoms. I cannot do it alone. we need many brains and influence to penetrate the hard core of the mystical atoms of the 2nd scientific revolution. - Sincerely, Allan Poe Bona Redoña (December 24, 2012)

                        Like ·  ·  · December 24, 2012 at 7:52pm








                        _________________________________________________________________________________


                        Jimmy Munday december 20, 2012)
                        there is one topic that myself and a friend were discussing last night that i do not believe many people have touched on, it has to do with size and perspective. Consider the size of the universe, compared to the size of one human being perceiving things compared to the size of an atom. We theorize that the universe is infinitely big, and a singularity is infinatly small. Say we were to use the strongest microscope available to zoom in on something very very small, on that plain of existance it seems logical that you could perhaps repeat the process on that qauntum level and it would get infinitely smaller and smaller, and yet still as detailed, same as on a larger scale. I hope that i've made some sort of sense and you understand what i'm trying to say, even if i can't properly word/explain it lol :/

                        Like ·  ·  · December 20 at 9:42am via mobile
                        • Billy Hollingshead likes this.
                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña by thinking of numbers (say, zero, 1,2,3,4,...zillion) expansion can be infinite. But as the thing grows smaller, it will reach the tiniest limit (in number,i.e. 1), then nothing (e.g. zero to the power of zero). If we could reach that limit, what we could possibly know (detect, perceive, see) is the perpendicularity of electenderic and magnetenderic junctioning in one common center, gravitenderic. For further explanation, search " Allan Poe Bona Redona most wanted profile " in www.Google.com and read there the topic about the " Unified Field "

                          Google
                          www.google.com
                          Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Goo...See More
                        • Jimmy Munday unfortunatly i can't atm because of credit restrictions on my phone and no computer/laptop internet, but when i get credit i most certainly will, thankyou 
                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña Thank you, too (Salamat din, in Tagalog)
                        • Jimmy Munday but this also raises the question, what is zero? Depending on whichever context you ask it in, it can be considered either an finite, or an infinte number. It could be just a way of determining something less than the lowest possible given value, which would also imply being infinite is just more than the highest ever given value. Technically you cannot measure the ''zero point''.
                        • Alisa McLaughlin Jimmy I have been saying this all along. BTW Think of Xeno's paradox. Everything just gets smaller but never reduces to nothing.
                        • Jimmy Munday in theory we could be a spec (single human) on a spec (earth) within a spec (solar system) within a spec(galaxy) so on (galaxy clusters) so on (universe) again (multiverse cluster) and beyond an infinite number of these situations repeating infinitly into infinity, and the exact same on a smaller scale hahahaha fucking mind blowing isn't it
                        • Jimmy Munday i doubt anyone could ever even try and comprehend the mathmatics behind this theory, it's hard enough trying to comprehend the concept alone hahaha
                        • Sid Ghaderi " i do not believe many people have touched on" ...I doubt it very much ..There are ample research and material on this subject .
                        • Billy Hollingshead The issue with maths as a tool of explanation is that it has it's own limitations. Zero? What is it except a concept described by maths. I have always been intrigued by the idea of constant equal division. For instance, if you travel half the distance...See More
                        • Billy Hollingshead @ Alisa McLaughlin, I agree with the statement, 'everything just gets smaller but never reduces to nothing'. Observing from the opposite direction I would add - everything gets bigger but never becomes everything. 
                        • Sid Ghaderi 'everything just gets smaller but never reduces to nothing'. I beg the difference. My bank account will prove otherwise !:-)
                        • Iandras Moontree Like fractals?
                        • Billy Hollingshead  Hahahaha Sid, you've solved the dilemma of ZERO.
                        • Sid Ghaderi As it approaches Zero it automatically jumps to the negative territory ! The fees won't let it stay at zero !
                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña The term "thing" in Alisa McLaughlin's "everything" never reduces to nothing simply because it is a "thing" (something), which absolutely comes from the powerful Causer of Existence. but "nothingness" is outside that "thing", or we may say, that "thi...See More
                        • Allan Poe Bona Redoña Somethingness (something) is different from nothingness (nothing). What would be left without "something" is "nothing", though it would not happen (i.e. non-existent of SOMETHING). The term "contains" means something and not nothingness; otherwise, everything is a container of "nothing".Then, what composes (or is making up) that "container" ?

                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña (January 10, 2013)
                          If atom is 99.999 99 % empty space, how come that it can cast its shadow as a 'real' thing ? Shadow may mean 'photons of light are being hindered'. The velocity of hitting light and of the electron are not the same. Light is faster than electron; thus, once light hit the mystical atom, the mystical 100 000-times-smaller electron would appear as an infra-tiny planetary object, whereas atom would appear as a nucleus with nucleons. This notion is proven-ly wrong, because the entire atom casts its shadow as if it were 100% filled with its contents. Not only that, the pengraletic electrons, which are big enough to be detected, are holding the atom concentrically-like, almost the same shape in a phenomenon when electric electrons jump out from the conductor.







                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                           The surface of an atom is not smooth or perfectly round, but like a dotted face of the Moon or Mercury or ,much more, as spongy (or thread-ly faced) asteroid. In the future if the crust/face of an atom can be photographed clearly, we can see how the lips of heisenberg passages on the atom's face make appear those odds on the atom's face. Those spots on the face of the surface-atom are very active for the (1) gravitational pull, (2) electrostatic stretchings, and weakly, for the (3) magnetism. They are also active for (1) acohaeric (hot) disturbances and/or arepellic (cold) pull.



                          (January 20, 2013)







                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                          Just a simple error and the world of physics is at risk of destroying itself

                          Science is a knowledge of certainty. But that is not the case in the 2nd Scientific Revolution: Science is asserted to be identified as a KNOWledge of UNCERTAINTY -contradiction. Knowing is leading to certainty, whereas upholding 'uncertainty' to ambiguity .
                          The error came when electron was imagined as a planetary object orbiting about the atom's nucleus - understandably because there was not a single photograph of atoms during those days (1910-1950). Rutherford, after firing a thin sheet of gold foil, imagined that the large volume of the atom is empty and a tiny repulsive nucleus was in it, without realizing that the thickness of the metallic sheet has something to do with the trespassing subatomic particle radiation. There is a ratio between the metallic sheet's thickness and the amount of the passed subatomic particle radiation. It had nothing to do with the emptiness of the atom. Bohr missed the fact that both spectral LAYERS and spectral LINES exist at the same time to two different directions. He focused only on the LINES, without realizing the more conspicuous LAYERS and without analyzing that the visible band (and even those invisible bands) in the spectrum has LAYERS because some little portions are re-directed or deflected to other direction (and those little portions are what we called spectral LINES) - and it has nothing to do with the orbiting object (i.e. mystical electron). Upholding the Rutherford Bohr's planetary electron, Heisenberg tried to determine the position, energy, and velocity of the said electron at the same time. What formula did Heisenberg use? He unintentionally re-expressed the De Broglie's equation (then divided by 2). This was a big blow of mistake! Imagine, locating electron by the re-expressed De Broglie's equation ? Heisenberg, however, thought that it was the "planetary electron" that had an anomaly -without realizing that he used (1st) a wrong electron, and (2nd) a wrong formula. He was NOT CERTAIN whether the electron and formula he had applied were right, but he was certain that momentum and position in the formula, if applied to a planetary electron, were not exact. Now, the BIG problem is not the unintended errors of those scientists, but when we know they were erred and still we uphold their error as right ones.

                          Uncertainty Formula (of the Uncertain Science) : error (L) x error (mv) ≥ correct (h),

                          where L is the location (position) of the planetary electron, m is its mass, v is its velocity, and h is the Planck constant, then divide it to 2.

                          error L ≥ correct h / error mv .

                          Certain Equation (of the 3rd Scientific Revolution) : correct L = correct h / correct mv ,

                          where " L " is the Lambda of the De Broglie's equation.





                          (January 20, 2013)



                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                          This is one of the many ways to convert tribo photons (tribons) into arepellic tribons (or arepellons), which our cryo-neuroreceptors in skin detect (sense) as a cold. When tribons (tribo photons) are arepellically stretched, cold field exists.


                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                          This is one way of converting tri photons of the atoms into arepellic field (i.e. COLD), by means of battery or electricity.

                          January 11, 2013



                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                          Gamma photons can be transformed (transmuted) into beta photons, and vice versa: change the magnetic and electric detectivities to change the name.

                          (January 11, 2013)

                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña the "absolute" components of the subatomic particles (e.g. electrons) are the gamma photons (if and only if the gamma photons cannot be decomposed down to tinier fragments).


                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña

                          A CALL FOR ENTHUSIASTS

                          Atom can be sketched by means of all available data and facts about electric, electricity, electronics, electrostatic, magnetic, magnetism, radiations, gases, elements, plasma, atomic nuclear, spectrum, spectral phenomena, mathematics, and physics, the way an engineer can sketch a complicated building by means of mathematics, geometry, etc. 
                          But for now, this possibility is being hindered by upholding a certain mystical atom. How good to be encouraged to test your talent in physics and mathematics to sketch the model of the atom. If I could only avail all the data and facts, I will do it. For now, my sketch for the model of atom is crude because I could not yet have an access for all available data & facts. I hope in the future, physicists will get interest in the factual atoms and electrons to construct the model down to how unified field master entities (photons) are varied-ly arranged from region to region or location to location in the atom and electron. We may begin with the Electron cloud. This CLOUD is composed of many tiny particles (i.e. beta photons) tightly holding each one another -elastic and stretchable- attracted to the heisenberg passages of the atom. In the future we may know why hydrogen atom can have 8 or more heisenberg passages, (1) upon which the falling (striking) light's quanta can be stumbled and repelled to an angled direction, and (2) by which hydrogen can be formed into solid . When strong foreign magnetic field is present, certain heisenberg passages's surfaces of gaseous molecules may split (or unzip), giving us a clue that surface atom's heisenberg passages are magnetically zipped. This may give us an insight that electron RADIATION is magnetically zipped, but can be unzipped if strong foreign magnetic Faraday field is present, and when unzipped e-ray bends perpendicular to from its former direction: this may suggest that e-ray's magnetic field is inwardly zipped and if make in-side out, bend the radiation.
                          If DNA sketch or model is decoded down to its atoms, physical atoms can be too decoded down to its components (alpha photons and beta photons).
                          - Sincerely,
                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                          (January 11, 2013)

                          (January 11, 2013)





                          January 18, 2013
                          Krystal M Brown


                          Scientific evidence that you probably don’t have free will
                          io9.com
                          Humans have debated the issue of free will for millennia. But over the past several years, while the philosophers continue to argue about the metaphysical underpinnings of human choice, an increasing number of neuroscientists have started to tackle the issue head on —

                          Like ·  ·  ·  · January 18 at 12:45am






                          Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                          Many researchers are finding difficulty to believe that brain cells are media for storing infos (experiences) because all cells in the entire body are almost identical in major constitution, thinking that it may mean all cells in the body are media storage. Actually, all cells in the body are storage of information. The question is how to translate those info into understandable signals and by what means. Neurons in the brain are storing media and can be electrochemically stimulate to replay/rewind what information they may have.
                          February 09  at 4:18pm (Saturday)




                          • Gena Byrd and 3 others like this.
                          • Matthew Glenn Tootle I hope you don't mind if I quote you../
                            February 10, 2013 Sunday at 3:53am · Like
                          • Fak You information not stored in cells moron
                            23 hours ago February 11, 2013 via mobile · Like
                          • Joe Newlon says who
                            10 hours ago February 12, 2013 

                            Allan Poe Bona Redoña



                            Storage Media

                            Memory's material is a device that have component which can be stored (retained) and can be recalled (extracted) when wanted. Any thing that is made up of atoms in this world,not only the cells, has that capacity because of the magnetic property or tribonic pengraletic electrons on the face of surface atoms of an object or material.
                            Thomas A.Edison thought and invented a crude way to obtain again stored 'infos' by playing back what were 'encoded' in the storage medium. His voice vibrated the needle,which caused impressions (indentations) on a rotating tin foil on a metal cylinder. When he play-backed, he mounted on it another needle,a record pick-ups. As he spun it again, the needle vibrated and punched its vibrations on a speaker,which emitted the sound vibrations. From this simple technique,stylus piezoelectric crystal, as an innovation, was used to pick up groove's recorded (indentated) undulations and converted the varying pressure into a varying electric current. (Piezoelectric crystal -e.g. quartz or Rochelle salt- is an object that when pressed will exert voltage,which can drive a small current round a circuit.) Later,magnetic materials were used to be arranged by 'impressing' electric current,so that the electric 'indentations' (infos) remained in their positions & directions on the magnetic medium and can be 'recalled' (playback) if needed. Today, we are using 'USB' to store information (video,audio,document,etc.). And in the coming future we will use atoms as storing material.
                            Do the cells composed of atoms or not ? Do the brain cells have surface-atoms INSIDE and outside of the nerve,dendrites & soma (cellular body) ? Yes,they have had ! Are their molecules 'redial-able' (re-up taken-able) or not ? The answer is obvious, Yes! The 'impressions' (infos) are 'painted' or indented on inside & outside of their surface-atoms of their soma, dendrires and nerve, and become part of themselves. The length of dendrites,nerve and the size of brain cells speak how many pieces of 'information' are impressed or structured to form into dendrites! This may mean that the DENDRIOCHRONOLOGY of brain cell is not only about the age of the dendrite but also the amount of 'infos' being impressed & structured into the length of the dendrite. (I am speaking for the future neurologists' activities.)
                            Now, we can answer if brain cells have memory or none ! (Although, different cells have divers ways of recording 'impressions' or infos. How to translate them in to understandable signals and by what means are what matter most.)

                            - Sincerely,
                            Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                            (February 13, 2013)

                            Celso Rojas, Gena Byrd and Hakeem Williams like this.





                            Allan Poe Bona Redoña (February 09, 2013)
                            By this scientific photograph we can see that electrons (junctions) between atoms are visible and some of them are bigger than the atoms themselves.

                            Joe Newlon likes this.





                            It is a fact that electric resistance increases in linear direction (or perhaps in capacitoric pengraletic direction) and grows weaker in voluminous direction (or apparently in concentric direction), as shown in the illustration here. This may explain partly the superconductivity phenomenon. Since balanic (atomic magnetic) repulsion is an activity of the extra photons disturbing an atom, the increased length of pengraletic electron in a particular element due to balanic repulsion, increases electric resistance. Reduction of pengraletic electron's length in an element, as in extreme cold (low temperature), may decrease electric resistance. If this is correct, we can conclude empirically that there is pengraletic denting in & rutherfordic structure of the atom.   (Allan Poe Bona redoña)




                            Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                            Many mystics are using fallacy of ultimate constitution to tell that "MATTER IS NOT REAL." Their notion is easy to test if true or false.
                            We are dust, and to dust we will return, and therefore we are composed of matter. An iron hammer is composed too of matter.
                            According to the notion: Matter is not real - and therefore, our body and the iron hammer are not real.
                            Try to hammer (with a force of 1000 newtons) their pinky finger, and let's see if their finger and iron are not real. And if any body is not satisfied by their possible report, try to do this: Hammer you own pinky finger, and let's see if the hammer and your finger are real or not.
                            Examples of fallacy of ultimate constitution:

                            " Our body is made up of matter;
                            matter is made up of invisible stuff;
                            therefore, we are invisible. "

                            " Matter is made up of (supposed) CONSCIOUSNESS;
                            Matter is not real;
                            Therefore, CONSCIOUSNESS is not real. "

                            - Allan Poe Bona Redoña
                            Like ·  ·  · March 6 at 7:24am
                            • Sid Ghaderi Not sure if those analogies are correct though. There are various attempts at describing what is real or not which may point to the root of the statements such as matter not being real, or things along those lines.
                              Here is my take, as far as an observer is concerned, only those things that s/he pays attention to EXIST in his/her realm of reality...much like the observer dilemma of the QP. If you do not pay attention, it does not exist for you. This does not imply that the unobserved does not exist at all, it simply means to the observer it does not.
                              Did you go for a walk or drive today ? If so, can you describe the cracks on the road or sidewalk?
                              You could, only if you paid attention, but you probably remember that nice lady, or nice guy who went by you by with a big smile!
                              As for the hammer and the pinky experiment, the only reason you feel the hammer on your finger is because of your senses.
                              Have you been to the dentist , or gone through surgery ? I'm sure they numb you so you would not feel a thing.
                              If disable your senses such as sense of feel, then things do change a little.
                            • EM ES you're talkin only about the third dimension, what about the other 10 ? hmmm
                            • Sid Ghaderi I have no idea what a 3rd or 10 dimensions are ...
                            • EM ES read about the string theory and you will ;]
                            • Sid Ghaderi Can I experience them in my daily life , or are they to be imagined / hypothesized ? Just asking
                            • EM ES if you take some DMT, you probably could
                            • Sid Ghaderi That would be illusions ,hallucination ,a different form of reality .
                              BTW, does anything in string theory make sense of why the original 10 dimensions were there to become our 3 1 universe or why there is only one time dimension--both before and after the expansion?
                            • Sid Ghaderi It can theorize it from dense aether model perceptive, the perspective of dense particle packing geometry in particular. If you compress the mutually repulsive particles, these particles will form clusters. If you compress them even more, these clusters will form another clusters, and so on. 
                              But there is the trick - the clusters in one generation have only limited interactions with the clusters in another levels, actually the more, the more these levels are separated. 
                              The number of these levels is surprisingly low and only three levels of particle clusters can exchange energy directly in transverse waves. Because the 3D clusters are preferred, as I explained above, it leads to the number of nine dimensions plus one or two time dimension(s).
                              I personally would not refer to them as 9 or 10 dimension though .
                            • EM ES not different form of reality because DMT is produced naturally by the pineal gland during sleep or before a person's death. so, can these illusions be real ? could they be visions from different dimensions ?
                            • Sid Ghaderi I once fell off the ladder , my body naturally responded by producing so much DMT to mask the pain that I was in a different realm .
                            • Sid Ghaderi But I could not bring back with me anything of use/value ...
                            • EM ES rofl, i see what u did there
                            • Sid Ghaderi And the question is , is it the brain that control us , or is it us controlling/in charge of the brain ?!
                            • Gena Byrd I thought that link explained it quite well. (Oh, I may have read more on it earlier in chapter 45: Mind, Brain, and Body). But in your question, do you mean "us" as our consciousness, or "us" as our bodies? The brain wouldn't control our consciousness...See More


                        Posted by at

                        No comments:

                        Post a Comment

                        Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)